Market Research

BofA’s ‘Car Wars’ report signals period of change and instability

News, 18 June 2025

Bank of America’s recent “Car Wars” report paints a challenging picture for the automotive sector, signaling a period of significant change and instability. Despite substantial investments in electric vehicle (EV) development, consumer adoption has lagged behind sales forecasts. EVs currently constitute a mere 8% of annual U.S. auto sales, falling short of earlier projections that spurred aggressive production plans and considerable financial outlay. The report attributes this deficit to ongoing obstacles such as inadequate charging infrastructure, high initial costs, and range anxiety, all of which suppress demand for electric models.

This evolving landscape has prompted automakers to significantly scale back their EV launch strategies. The originally projected 140 new EV models are predicted to drop to just 71 over the next four years, according to the research. This revision reflects not only consumer hesitation but also the influence of shifting regulatory incentives and broader economic pressures. John Murphy, a Bank of America Securities analyst, underscored the magnitude of this shift, stating that the “unprecedented EV head-fake has wreaked havoc on product plans,” and cautioning that There will be a great deal of ambiguity and volatility in product strategy during the next four years.

For major automakers like General Motors and Ford, this reduction in EV focus could have significant consequences. Murphy warns of potential multi-billion-dollar write-downs on EV investments initially made due to earlier policy encouragement and market optimism. The initial drive for electrification gained momentum during the Biden administration’s emphasis on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, but changing economic and political factors have since slowed progress, forcing automakers to make difficult financial decisions.

A significant slowdown in the industry’s introduction of new vehicles is compounding these challenges. Only 29 new models were introduced in 2024, the fewest in decades. Forecasts for the future are similarly cautious; only 159 new models are anticipated to be introduced overall during the next four years, which is far less than the historical average of more than 200. It is anticipated that showroom replacement rates, which are essential for dealership traffic and industry expansion, will decline from the current 15% to 11% in 2026 and 2027. Even Tesla, which is sometimes viewed as an oddity in the industry, is predicted to have a replacement rate of 22.4%; however, Murphy voiced doubt that Tesla will carry out these plans considering its past hesitancy to launch completely new model generations.

Internal combustion engine (ICE) models are making a comeback as a stabilizing influence in the automotive industry despite these difficulties. Murphy points out that many automakers still make a lot of money from these cars, and they will be crucial in raising the money needed to finance upcoming investments in connectivity, electrification, and autonomous driving. In order to secure funding for the uncertain future, he thinks automakers should emphasize their core ICE product lines. It is anticipated that SUVs and trucks in particular will offer vital support, allowing businesses like Ford, GM, Stellantis, and, to a lesser extent, Toyota, to preserve shareholder returns while negotiating a market that is changing quickly.

Murphy asserts that the secret is to properly manage the shift to electric and connected vehicle technologies while utilizing the profitability of core ICE products. In order to take advantage of future opportunities, he recommended that manufacturers reassess their connections with dealers and consumers and focus on the lucrative connectivity area. The study suggests that automakers have the ability to come out stronger and more resilient in the face of major industry change if they prepare well and execute their plans with discipline.

Back to top button